Document text
Machine-read from the scan, so expect some errors. Lines that couldn’t be read are left out.
Page 1
Col. George F. Schlatter BEST COPY AVAIMBLE 1, AEC 153/32 - Public Announcement on Cperation GREENHOUSE N-r, Trapncll outlined the schedule for public release of the proposed announcement on ~peration GREENHOUSE (AEC 153/32) and said that, following Presidential approval of the release and upon completion -of the fourth and final shot, it was cxpcctcd that release would bc made without further reference to the Commission unless new problems arose. A prcs.s confcrcncc on the tests was being arranged to be held in Viashington m mld - Junc upon the return of the Commander of the Task Force, the Scientific Director, and other kcy personnel. After further discussion the Commission:
Page 2
At this point IUessrs. Schlatter, TrapneU, and Thompson left the meeting, and during the following discussion General McCormack and Mlr. 2, AEC 190/46 - Cooperation in the Field of Atomic Energy Mr. Boyer said that the present paper (AEC 190/46) had been prepared by the staff on the understanding that the Commission wished a revision of the AIZC position on cooperation with the UK and Canada, which noted the Department of Defense position on the problem and presented an independent statement of the Commission’s views. He recommended that the Commission adopt this paper, with such revisions as it wished, as a basis for discussion by the Chairman with the Spccia 1 Committee of the National Security Council. The Commission discussed extensively the statement of the AEC position contained in AIZC 190/46 and the proposed revision contained in Mr” ~:urraY’s memorandum to the Commissioners dated lhlay 16, 1951 (copy on file in the Cfficc of the Secretary), It was pointed out that the basic policy decision to be made by the President and National Security Council was whether partnership between the UK and Canada and the United States should be full or limited, and that the ambiguities and limitations in the Department of Defense position which had been discussed with the XULC at the conference on May 7, 1951, might better be clarified following any such policy decision. Mr. Boycr said that the question had arisen of a second conference of representatives of the UK, Canada, and the U.S. on security standards and practices, on the lines of the one held in Washington June 19, 1950 (AEC 302/10). Mr., Glennan pointed out that scheduling of such a conference while establishment of an Executive Branch position on relations with the UK and Canada was underway would bc a us cful demonstration of the Commission’s concern for maintenance of security under an extended program of cooperation. After further discussion and detailed revision of AEC 190/46, a. APFROVED, as revised at the meeting, the AEC position on cooperation in the field of atomic en”ergy (subs equen’$ly circulated with revisions as AEC 190/49);
Page 3
b, NC TED that the views of Commissioner Murray on cooperation in the field of atomic energy would be made part of the record (subsequently incorp,oratcd in AEC 190/49); c. NC TED that the Chairman would request the Executive Secretary of the National Security Council to call an early meeting of the Special Committee to consider the subject of cooperation in the field of atomic energy, and that copies of the Commission’s position would be transmitted to the other members of the Special Committee;