Document text
Machine-read from the scan, so expect some errors. Lines that couldn’t be read are left out.
Page 1
tinsivo collect:.on of organism from the reef, lagcm, 31-74high saw the cost cf radiolorleel araly5e8 or bait mar ter or Ixth 38ve Pot bean t!h re hafrbam a radlobiologicd. suvey for all of tbe pad uqmrx te8t
Page 3
1. Ishnd, reef ard lag or muveys cf t?heXarshall Is2ards ard 11. oceuogrmhi c ard fishir~fsmvays i E the Test !ite ama and Iv. $urvey8 to Ee take m am ‘a~ wededw kasis. These would ir,- Is the nreseit prograr adeq~ate? Proba&2;-I:Creasonable program program adequ’ e to protide the infcmmatfon needed by the UC to ft]f:11 The ansuar !S a q.alified no if Mfenrice is mdc to the program
Page 4
mmvays, which di<fers from the prese t profram ir: that f[Shii+ for fir~ suggestions but scm are debatable. A few cf the ztatenents to uhich exeentien Is taker.till te riven. he me ixmws exactly hobifar the vati.cwc radioactiw ffaterials ale carr%ed irjthe ocsw and, outeide the Qarahall 1slands, very little akout of even 1~ of the miuir4 cirgari CBS comwrned, nor hou or tc what extent could not be regarded ae irtersive. The remairder of the Etatieritcan
Page 6
of the examples is that of the fiehoa in which he cites the eoniritxtion 1 ehnd6 , fI it takea 10 years t:.i&nt3fy the fishee aione for cne part ,(?npag~ 22 the paat wcrk has been criticized because it 1B claimed that “--—-an mpreciable amount of the samling of :-oecimericfor radioactivity has been oarricd o~t by taking a general collection of many L?pecie6,a$hin~ them tugether ard testtrg the ftml retid~-ea6 a si figle th!.s nanner. Each sample has been idortified by ita scie:;tiflcname, prepared indivldually aJxithe data for the SWP1 es recorded on individual cards. In ~orting the data, Ewc$)1c6hsve been grouped under commn of the reathr just l s Dr. Earry hae hiaal~f in reporting cc the coIlectioxxz ha made in the Mestern Pacifia.
Page 7
occus on page ?h. ‘This particular EWC108 oi sea baes my store lation to rmclear teatff.m In concluding the reaarks OE specioe identification it IE to be identified but it would appear that to spend that is here indicated uould mean that other The recognition of th~ Dmttlem as being radiolo~ and oceanography Is quite proper. the effort on *tematice more important areas would !n the fields of biology, stationc have kmen ti8Qly selected &t from the nrogrzm outlined 1 t would appear that there uovld be l wery lurge collection of Ee@ea with the aralysim of only a mall proportion. As the result of past surveys we have row reached tho stage uhere we wish tc place &ore eE@a8iB on the acaiyses of samples to determine the isotopes presert with 16S6 amlyms of a great miabar of 6asples for gross activity analyses of samplea UOLM km a bottleneck to the Korhtor ?rograx. shculd include radio 888=6 for gross beta md chemical deteminat.ion of at least most of the that andyeis in made for only five of the ti68Le8 of a month only 20 fl sh could be eaoh of the 20 land statiofis
Page 8
,perwnth would be the lxtent of the isotopic a14Jyees program. r.xclwhd vcwld be d 1 the other fi sh, all of the other crgard.sac,and fish par lmd -tion per tires months cmld b aralysed. If an expanded pmfram is needed are fknde available? Cap-n Ruelk etatd f.D a tmlephone call t-.at ilih did ret have mepomi blli~ to conduct l =nmwy euch ae suggestmd in tho Monitor Research ?ro$ect and therefore would rat provide fmds to etwort It. Zlnm funde for In csnclwrlof:it car be said that the RGr:ttiringhesaarciaF’reject can rat he Cnqq!orted because finds are not lwii hbh. A8 for the pm- ~an, the AK interests would be better selmd if there were E.oreemphasis on the quantitative analysis of the eamPle8 ld less on eyetamatic8. Pacifia ard in the idantifioatioE of the flches but do rat have experienced peraonid for ldanttflcation of the other glvupa of GrgaEiUm8, in radiolo~ or iv ocmariography. The vrogr~ outlined by Dr. Harry would
The text continues in the original scan (9 pages).