Document text
Machine-read from the scan, so expect some errors. Lines that couldn’t be read are left out.
Page 1
ainicol Investigations of New Drugs In Humon Beings better paltion to perform that iaa aderhould be allowed before lmplernentanon of a mew rEQulrmmr In order to prorlde such education. An approprlnb time period would be 1 year.
Page 2
Archives and RIcordr Otfice tocol for review ought to be allowed to *paNclpate In the dellberatlona of the peer comdttee: however, he should not * be permltted to take part In the deelslons 2. Chmga In protocol m often re- ~uircdu a given lnveatlptlon procecdr: h-er. the present peer group proposll does not make clear under what c h u m - atmeed these chaneu would requlre a rcm ler t the peef group. It h clear that only substantial changes In protacol ought to repulre Wa addltlorul 3. If forelm Invest’gaton conduct studies In other countries under IND’s. thw should be rmuired to follow the brobedure set forth for hves ~ pto mtn tbe United States. 4. The Code of Helslnkl ought to 6 e a mMmum bash for t h e declsloM reached by the peer commlttccr 1. Peer group commlttru must not except Insofar IS they functlon to safeguard patlentu or volunteers from Inecponslble m d careless investleatom. 1. &me of the suggeStlOns made for cxpmdlne the actlvltles of these commltteu are not reallstlc In terms of how much work h involved m d what the effect may be on the performance of fudges. consumer group reprcrent.tlves. out sll the ramillcatfonr and complexltlw and to develop a workable, realIaUc proneedlessly hunstringlng researchem. E. The American Society of Hospital tb.t t h e repulatlon be changed to mdla t e Uut there be pharmacy representstfOn 0 the peer commlttem and to provide for t h e dulgnatlon of pharmacy and therapeutlu commltteu u peer The Commissioner of Food and Drugs, havlng conddered t h e comments, fmds 1. To achieve a hlanced revlew of a the nature of t h e research as well u the acceptablllty of the research In terms of relevant law and communlty sceeptance. r vg ing backgrounds of commlttee membem are wsentlal. The need for broad mnsfderatlons of the ethlcal md mora aspects of research In humans, In iddltlon to the scientlflc justlflcatlon. 1s too Important Lo llmlt ievlew of such proposals to Indlvlduals wlth the same areas of interests. tmlnlnc. and background. 1. In vlew of the need for committee members with varying backgrounds. refemhe to the review commltke u a mlttn” Is more approprlate. 3. The approval or disapproval of a study is the eommlttee’s rcsponsiblllty. The review bp the Food and Drug AdminLrtratlon Is In addltlon to the pDmmittM RULES AND REGULATIONS ‘. rcvlew for those rtudlu that M approved by the wnunlk 4. The requirement for W tut lon al committee review applla to all three phasea of cllnlcal studler on lnstltutlonsllzed human tubjects and to studlu conducted by an lndlvldual lnvestlgator a late d rlth M Instltutlon which study to wure .depuate protectlon of Npulrernentr of the regulation Y mended below do not extend to ellnierl studlea conducted by m Indlvldual InvUeator Independent of any InsUtutlOe There la a need for exkndlng the protection affomkd t tblr-ret\llation b all human nseveh rubjectr: however, because of the medal problem assoelated with the subject of a elln1alstud.y conducted on nonlnstltutlonallzed rubjeeb or patlmtu by an Indlvldual lnrertlcator, lt is preferable to deal with UIM fr behe developed Md nill k plbllrhed nrlttees. and to obtaln lnslght into the smnsom should refer b the O r ~ ~ t r Admlnistmtlon Manual of tho US. DePsrtment of Health, Education. and Weliare.ThL manual hubtar developed by knowledgeable and expuleneed Indlvidullt In the problem of undertaking research h humans. Thtr ngulatiar. therefore, includes many of the dctrl’ed euldellna wvered by the Orants Admln6. T o assure objectivlh of the commtt tee. nelther the smmr nor the lnvatigrtor should have. vole8 in the selection of commltte mcmben. keep adeauite recorda to document thelr 8. The Investigator should putlcipnb ln the commlttee dellbemtlond only to provlde inlonnstlon to the committee necessary In Wa repulatloa . sponslblllty under this rerulation appeam 11. The NIng of a notlee of elrimed lnveatlertlonal exemptlon for a new drug for Investigation abroad requlrar the .same wmmltment u lf the rtudy were 12. The Declaration of Heldnkl 11 a of the humma wed rn reseuch cUbjects. More sWc guidance h neerssary m d in m e Instance more rldd regulrenacted nith the mClrJl protocol Under eonsldemtlon from puUclp.tlon 0 the committee revlew tr not Inkndcd to meamurce oflnfomatlon to the commltk f. The lnvestlgitor should partlclpnk In th; , committee dellberatlons to Lhls extent. Therefore, pursuant to provlslons 01 m d under auth0rlW delemkd to . Nno dmgJ lor Inoesflgatbnnl we In human bclngs; aemptfonr from Jectlon by rerlslng the Introdqcton statement of dlvtdon 10 to read 18 follows: tbe n1ann.d Inratlcatlons and a drscerlptloa fIO. A n orttltne oi any pave or phew ot t
Page 3
Lawranco B w k dry Laboralg RULES AND REGULATIONS tmd~tloD.may DOL be overruled by the Inpunukat to Chapter 140 of the OrnntI mer. I t la recommended that these guideline follorcd In ertabllahlsp lnstItutlon.I mrlew eo mm ltte u and that the commltteea wrlhed thereh A Blgnlng d the Form uon hoverer. h u on ale W l th the Deputuaurancea ana a staument to thb eEect albU1ty to monltor the study. the Food and mlne whether the commlttees u e operatla; at the end to a armtcolon and iddlng the proval as described 1n ltem 1Oc above. an rddlrional statement assuring that the Invotlzaclon WUInot be lnftlatcd urlor to asrovrl of the ,study by -such by rerisihp divldons 3 urd 5 to read aa dblllty for the atudy. UNr ln Ce nut be @Ten tbat an lnatltut1on.I re vier commlttn I# rler ma apporal of the propored cl1nIc.l of su3hlent members of Vuylng background. 4h.t ls. lawyen. clerffmen. or Iasmen u well ma rlentbt., to assure complete and adequntc ?8TleW of the research proJcet. Tbe membenhlp muat pourti not only hrond COUIpctcnce to eomprehcad the nature of the rY to juage the Icceptbblllt? Of the prop Ect or bctlrlty In 1c;mr 01 ltrsututlonal remmnnl praetiso. and community ueeplsnce. .aurmw must be presented that the Inrntlgntor has not p.ltlrlpated In the = I c e - Uon of commlttre membcn, that the revler hOl Vcd In the conduct 01 the mearch l e - matron to (he committea): that the invmiWar wlll repon to the committee for rer ler "-. or propored procedural chrnges whleh mnr meet the stnuti of the ~nvcatiget~onand no mch change Xlll be made without m ~ ltle enpproval except Where neccmry !or the study. u unn ce must ha given chat Uble for Inlual and continuing revlcw nnd appmral of the pmpowd ellnlcal atudy. The mcmhcnhlp muat ba comprucd oi sumclcnt membcn of rnrylng blckground. that la. lamen. clergymen. or laymen u well as uknttau. to wun complete and aCequate nvlew of the memh project. The meniborahlp muat pcueu not only bmad ccmpctence also other compeuneln neceuary to Judge In tern of lnmUtutlon31 regulatlonr, relevant pmenw that the InrcaUgauV has not partlclpatea In the rlectlon of commlttn not allow parnclpntlon In Iu nrler and condualom by any lndlvldunl involved ~n the eonduct of the rst8r+h actlvlty unaer re- ? f e r (except + provldo Information to the cammlttee) that the Inreaupator will report to the tomrmttee for rerlew any emerrent pard procdunl changes rNch m y aEect the N t u i Of the lnreatlgnuon and that no approval except where necuruy t o ellmlnnte apparent bmedlate haznrdr: thnt revlcvl of the aNdy.WlI be conducted by the revlea cunmlttm at InImrls appmprlate to the de- of rlak. but not excecdlng I year. to u n u e that the nukrch project la belns conducted In armpliince rich the ccmmltln% understanding and rceo'mmendrtlona: that the revlaw committee u provided all the IDaweiops adequatd procedure for .reponlne tu nndmp to the Imtltutlon. The d a u - menta malnUlncd by the mmmlttee are to Include the namu and qu.IlfiuUons of committee memben records of InfOrmatlOn co1UcIlt. comnlttee ~ curs lo non substantive can nvlewn u they art performed. Copler of au aoeumenu are t r - b a retamed for 4 p~cdof a pua put the completion or dhaNIahle upon mquem ta auiy authorized mrauoa (Ibronblr recommendntlona by the or COMIUOM nur not M overruled by the Ilutltution oaeiail.) PmOeduree for the np n lu U on and opemtlon of Inrtltutlonal review commftteer are contalncd In @deha lvued pu mun t to Cbdpter 140 of the Deprrtment of Hellth. EdUC1tIon. nna W e b fare. anllable from the US. Government mung Om-. It Is recommended that these rtltuuoanl rnrlew commltteer m d that the adura ducrtbed themld A dgnlng of the ment of Iiellth. Educntlon. and \VcIrare. wee. " and the ume commltw la to mier the proposed ltudy uslog the ramr proedurcr. tNa IS ncceplnble In llcu of the bbove Lo\vJncw and a atatemcnt to thls effut ahould he pmvlded Wlth the rlsned lag relponslbUlty to monllar the study. (he Ufm rhlCh yrwa to wume ruponalblllty I ep relent at IT U of the Pod and Dag Admln-
Page 4
tlon h u been submltted to the sponaor a M to tho prevloul IUbKniYiOn XI11 bo adoqunu). I. Subparagraph (13). Form 1513, by addlng to dlvision 4 B new ltem h. eu h. m e Inveiugator U' re quid to UNN r l u not be lnltlaccd untll the in8ututlonal revlaw commlttn h u revleared an4 approved the study. (ne organlzatlon and procedure requlremenu for luch a cormnlttee lhould be explalncd to the Inreallpator by the Iponmar Y met forth In form FD-1671. dlvlslon 'Edectioe dote. This order shall become eEectlve 30 days after I t s date of publlcatlon In the FEDERALREGISTER. Commissioner OJ Food and Drugs. OF NONIMMIGRANTS UNDER THE ACT, AS AMENDED Types of Nonimmfgranf Visas In FR.Doc. 11-3361 appearing a t page 4607 In the issue for Thursday. Much 11. 1911. in the second hint of t 41.10Ua) (3) the word "classlfled" should read Chapler Xlll-Bureau of Labor Slandardr, Deparfrnenl of Labor IPART 1520-CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING WHETHER STATE WORKPROVIDE ADEQUATE COVERAGE On October 9, 1970. it w85 propo ed to amend 29 CFR Chapter XIXI by {ddlng thereto a new Part 1520 entitied *XX& for Dtterrnlning Whether Skta Workquate Covernee for Pneumoconlods" (35 PR. 15933). Wrltten data. views or uguments of interested persons were Invited on the new Part 1520. RULES AND REGULATIONS ments melved. It hM been dmlded Lo nuke several changes and addltlOM to 'clarify the proposed Part 1510 and to provlde more preclslon in Implementing Part C of Tltlt IV of the Federal Coal Mlne Health and Safety Act of l D d 9 (83 Stat. 705). A new pnraunph d nlm ted ride adequate coverage for Pneuj moconlosls they shall be entitled to claim beneflts under Title IV, Part C. of the Act. Section 42l(b)(I) of the Act Prourn Ian shall not be deemed to provide adequate coverage for pneumoconloala during any period unless'lt is Included I8 the list of State law?. found by the Geeretuy of Labor to provlde ad mute cover- - for pneumooonlolk durlns a w h law in such Ut durlnr uu mod onll If he finds that during such Period there prorklons wi may be Pnrcrlbcd by ih (b) The purpose of ita part is to forth the crlterla whlch the Gccrelrry or pensatlon law wlll be Included In the Url which provide adcguata coveram for pneumoconiosis durlng any wrlod. Mine Health end Safely Aci 01 I S 8 fu arrsuant to Title IV. Part C. of Vu Act due to pneumoconloal; worked a?. an employee In an under. ground mal mlne, whether he mrtr under the srpiace pcr f omg funcuom in extmctlng the coal o. abow cha axface a t the mine prcm tho cad (0 decedent a t the Ume of hh den* or Irrins apart for renaonabla f.un Q b e aue of hls descrtlcq r b o hu od household wi the mtna: of Uonr from the miner for ha ruDDa(; 0 a court Lo contrlbuk LO he?wm. and a atudent as defied 4SUEC 0101 the time he reaches 10 rand U@.f0 L 80 long u he contlnues (0 80 Neb 8 ?' student or untll he rnarr(.r: OT (il)Over 18 yean of am and nap- t or mental dlsablllty: :(f) "Coal .Mine" meam ul m a d I ,tunnels. excavatlons, and other proprw mal or personal. placed urn. under. * . bbove the surface of 8uch land by brson. Jsed in,or to be usd in. or such u e a bltumlnour cod. iimite. 0 deposit of coal (overburden) la not fi moved in mining. YI addlllon to me nrl.